CCA Parties Filed an Application for Rehearing of the PCIA Portfolio Optimization Decision

The CCA Parties argue that the Phase 2 Decision:

• Fails to proceed in the manner required by law, as required by Public Utilities Code Sections 1757(a)(2), 366.2(g), and 365.2, by failing to provide unbundled customers the full benefits of system and flexible RA in the investor-owned utilities (IOUs’) PCIA portfolios;
  ‍
• Fails to meet the requirement of Section 1757(a)(4) by rejecting the RA VAMO without substantial evidence in light of the whole record;
  ‍
• Fails to proceed in the manner required by law, as required by Public Utilities Code Sections 1757(a)(2), 366.2(g) and 365.2, by failing to provide unbundled customers the full benefits of GHG-Free energy in the IOUs’ PCIA portfolios;
  ‍
• Fails to meet the requirement of Section 1757(a)(4) by rejecting the GHG-Free Energy allocation by ignoring substantial evidence in light of the whole record of the value of this product to unbundled customers;
  ‍
• Abuses its discretion contrary to Section 1757(a)(5) by encouraging a collaborative Phase 2 working group process but ignoring the collaborative work product; and
  ‍
• Violates the due process rights of stakeholders who relied to their detriment on the Commission’s directive to create consensus proposals based on working group discussion and analysis.
  ‍